Wednesday, December 2, 2020

Rhetoric in Music

 Throughout this course we have seen how rhetoric has shifted into various forms, such as speeches, sermons, letter-writing and even painting, but what about the different styles of rhetoric that we have not discussed? Dance, sports, games, and, of course, music have been underlying works of rhetorical art that have been rarely discussed. 

To really show how rhetoric is expressed in music, I will be comparing different rhetorical devices that may be used in writing that can transfer over into musical composition. Let's begin!

The first rhetorical device I would like to discuss is an anaphora. In rhetoric, an anaphora is the repetition of a word or expression at the beginning of successive phrases, clauses, sentences, or verses especially for rhetorical or poetic effect. An example of this would be saying "For the people, I shall exist. For the people, I shall die." The repetition of "For the people" is an anaphora. Comparing this to music, an anaphora is a repeated phrase in music that begins different phrases. As seen in Chopin's Scherzo, No.2, Op. 31, the beginning melodies are a repeat of each other. However, the repeated melodies are the start of different phrases, mirroring the finishing of a clause as if we were reading sentences. 

The next rhetorical device is an epiphora. Epiphora is the repetition of the same word or words at the end of successive phrases, clauses or sentences. The epiphora is actually the opposite of an anaphora in that the anaphora repeats at the beginning of the phrase while an epiphora repeats at the end of the phrase. In writing, an epiphora can look something like our courtroom oaths, stating "Do you solemnly swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?" The emphasis on "truth" at the end of each phrase creates an epiphora while also expressing how important the emphasized word is. Music uses epiphora in the same way. In Yohann Sebastian Bach's Violin Sonata No.1 in G minor, Bach uses an epiphora in a small part in the presto movement. If you cannot hear it, you may be able to see that in the middle row, there are four measures that have identical endings with the exact same three last notes. These notes create an epiphora since they are repeated at the end of each phrase, bringing a connection through the music. 

The third rhetorical device is anadiplosis, or the repetition of a word or words in successive clauses in such a way that the second clause starts with the same word which marks the end of the previous clause. An example from poetry would be Robert Burns' poem "A Red, Red Rose." Burns' writes "O my Luve is like a red, red rose..." The repetition of "red" creates a complete clause, for only saying "My Luve is like a red" creates an incomplete statement, so following the line with another "red" and using "rose" helps complete the clause while also emphasizing the color of the rose. In music, the emphasis of anadiplosis can build tension or create an emphasis on the mood of the piece. An example of andaplosis in music can be found in Mozart's final movement of his Symphony No. 41 in C Major. Although it may be hard to hear the lower voices playing it, you can see the eighth note runs in the top line connect to the lower voices in the bottom few lines later on. Once the upper voices play their eighth note run, the lower voices repeat the run and continue it in a different octave to finish the phrase. The sharing of one repeated rhythm express anadiplosis in the music since it is taking the same rhythm and finishing a phrase throughout different voices in the ensemble. 

Finally, the last rhetorical device that I will discuss is epizeuxis, which is the repetition of a word or phrase in immediate succession, typically within the same sentence, for vehemence or emphasis. This rehtorical device is often usedi n political debates to try and emphasize a person's values. An example can be seen in Winston Churchill's "Never Give In" speech. Churchill says "Never give in. Never give in. Never, never, never -in nothing, great or small, larger or petty - never give in, except to convictions of honor and good sense." The repetition of the phrase "never" creates emphasis on the word and builds emotion around it. The same empahsis in repition can be placed in music, as seen in Igor Stravinsky's "The Rite of Spring." In this section of Stravinsky's piece, he uses a certain chord to strike the idea of oncoming thunder at the renewal of spring. The repeating thunderous chord is intimidating and disrupts the flow of the piece, but it also makes it clear to the audience on what is happening in the music. The chord would not have the same effect if it were not repeated in such a way. 

As you can see, music has many rhetorical values in it. Rhetoric helps the music create a story. With rhetoric, notes become words and chords become moods. Music can be just as persuasive as any other style of rhetorical art. Although I only discussed a few of the rhetorical devices that can be used in both writing and music, there are many more that can be found. Perhaps you can relate these rhetorical devices to other styles of rhetoric that we did not discover in this course. After all, this isn't music theory. 

Music Theory, Memes, Rocket Science, Funny, Humor | Music jokes, Memes, Music  theory 

5 comments:

  1. This is such an interesting post Jennifer! I know next to nothing about music theory or analyzing music, but I found this post very understandable nevertheless. The idea that rhetorical devices like repetition make music meaningful and persuasive in the same way they do any written or spoken work is so important. This really ties into the theory that "everything is rhetoric"!

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is such an interesting way to look at rhetoric's presence in the general world! I certainly had not thought of the rhetoric of music, especially such as in classical pieces as you've explained here! This post has introduced me to some rhetorical structures that I am unfamiliar with, and it's really interesting to see how much repetition can play a role. As such, you can certainly see evidence of these and other rhetorical appeals in music.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I really liked this post, Jennifer; the relation of rhetoric to music in this way is incredibly compelling to read. I had always considered music's rhetorical ability to end with the lyrics paired with it, the accompanying sounds only working to emphasize words. But your explanation of things such as the anaphora and how it is different yet similarly defined in rhetoric vs music made a lot of sense. I find myself moved by music that features no lyrics all the time (for example, Requiem for a Dream's "Lux Aeterna" or more recently the Prowler's theme in Spiderman Into the Spiderverse), I had never considered this to be the work of rhetoric, though. Thanks for this post!

    ReplyDelete
  4. The meme at the end is so funny! I was in band for nine years growing up, so I really enjoyed reading your post here. Music, like all art, is so rhetorical. You explained the concepts and connected them to music so clearly. There were some rhetorical devices in here that I wasn't familiar with before (or at least, I didn't know the names of them). This was such an interesting post to read and learn from! :)

    ReplyDelete
  5. I had never considered how 1:1 these ideas might be. Makes me wonder if ideas that are primarily musical could be brought into rhetoric. Perhaps something like the leitmotif? I imagine there are many examples of phrases or quotes that could be used to evoke the idea of a specific person. Something along the lines of how “I have a dream” makes one think of MLK, or “four score and seven years ago” makes one think of Abraham Lincoln. In fact, there are so many examples of this that it probably has its own name. Though I have no idea what it might be. That aside, the more I think of what a leitmotif would be in language the more I get the feeling that it's just a word or words. Like, leitmotifs are a score that signal recurring themes or characters. To do the same thing with words I would just say something to the effect of “aw shit, it’s [recurring character or theme] again”. If done properly, it could be distilled to just the name of the character or theme, instead of an entire sentence.
    Anyway, I'm going to link to the Kay and Pele skit “Dicknanigins” because it is funny and possibly relevant. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xdXo8uJ9NSk&ab_channel=Key%26Peele

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

St. Augustine and How Humans are Inherently Flawed

            Ok so, Christianity is super old, right? So is rhetoric, and the church has been using rhetoric for a very long time. Look at th...